Archive for twilight

Love Triangles in Young Adult Novels

I just finished a book the other day (Descended by Blood by Angeline Kace) that had the most hideous and poorly written love triangle since Twilight. Or, well, did it?

Once I finished reading, I started thinking more about it. Really, I loathe love triangles. I don’t even like calling them “love” triangles, because they’re generally more about lust and instant-gratification than a true, deep love. Someone must love them, though, because they are -all-over-the-place- in Young Adult literature.  ALL over the place.

In fact, they’re so prevalent right now that when I started googling tonight to find some YA books that do -not- have a love triangle, I came across these two blog posts discussing exactly what I’m bringing up here: Julia from The Broke and the Bookish and Read.Breathe.Relax.

Their posts are so recent, in fact (both in February of this year), that I almost did not go ahead with writing this one. It’s been done, it’s been complained about…but, well, I won’t feel better til I put it out there. So here I go.

I know when my loathing began – Twilight, with Bella and her dopey inability to figure out whether she should be with stalker-esque Edward or I-love-you-even-though-you-love-him Jacob. That was seriously just brutal and inane.

Then I read others: Clockwork Angel by Cassandra Clare, Wings by Aprilynne Pike, Firelight by Sophie Jordan, Fallen by Lauren Kate, Wither by Lauren DeStefano…I’ll not even mention the various Twilight dupes.

At this point while compiling my still-incomplete list, I poked Bree of 1 Girl 2 Many Books and asked her for some input.  With her help, I added Shatter Me by Tahereh Mafi, Matched by Allie Condie, and The Girl in the Steel Corset by Kady Cross (it apparently has TWO!). I have not read these three books, so I had to also ask her for the names of the characters involved in the Lust Triangles of Doom.  While trying to come up with the names for Shatter Me, she mentioned Juliette and Adam, but could only remember that the second male’s name started with a W (and Bree is a woman who remembers things, accurately and quickly most times). In fact, her exact words were, after she went looking for the name, “Ok, my review doesn’t mention the guy’s name. He was too cookie cutter for me to care about.” (The name is Warner, by the way – I googled it.)

Really, I think that sums it up quite nicely.  These stories are cookie cutter blocks of text set to a particular formula with only very slight deviations from one another.  Some are a little more nicely baked, others are flat, some are fluffy, and more than a few are just trash. So, why? Is it because “love” sells? Are authors using these things as crutches because of an inability to push a story forward with plots of substance?

Now, despite my utter hatred for most Lust Triangles of Doom, I will admit that some are done nicely.  For instance, the love triangle in The Hunger Games – I’ll call it love on this one because honestly, it seems like the feelings in all three characters are genuine and solid, not just thrown in willy nilly because it’ll make it easier to carry on to the second book. (Off-tangent onto another tangent – (Julia, you say this in your post, as well, and I totally agree) WHY the heck can’t we have any standalone YA novels? Everything -has- to be a series? Also, why are YA books so SHORT? Teenagers don’t all have 30 second attention spans, you know. But I digress…) Anyhow, Gale/Katniss/Peeta was so much less offensive and forced.

There’s also a sort of love triangle (though it’s a secondary part of the story that HELPS the plot rather than IS the plot) in another book I read recently, Fair Coin by E.C. Myers, that is tolerable. It might help that it’s a male protagonist with two girls in the picture, and that he always knows exactly which one he wants.

The third “good” one that I can think of can’t be mentioned here, as the second book in the trilogy has been released recently enough that I feel it’d be a spoiler to talk about it. It was unexpected, and believable.

What do you think? Are Lust Triangles of Doom overdone? In which novels do you think they’ve been written in a way that doesn’t grate the nerves? Why do you think so many authors are including them in their books?

I’d love to hear your thoughts on the subject!

Promise by Kristie Cook

Title: Promise Promise by Kristie Cook
Author: Kristie Cook
Genre: Fantasy/Paranormal Romance
Publisher: Ang’dora Productions, LLC (self pub)
Publication Date: July 20, 2010
eBook: 475kb, Print 336 pages
Where’d I Get It: .99 sale @ Amazon.com

Synopsis (From Goodreads): Alexis Ames decides to learn who she really is, with or without the help of her mother, who guards their secrets closely. After meeting Tristan Knight and discovering that he’s not normal either, the secrets begin to unravel. Their union brings promise to the future of mankind. But it also incites a dangerous pursuit by the enemy. Because they are a match made in Heaven and in Hell.

My Thoughts: I wanted so very much to love this book.  I read the synopsis on Goodreads.com and it seemed interesting.  When the Kindle price on Amazon went to 99 cents, I snagged it.

My delight at the price, though, was where the happy ended.

This review may lean slightly toward the side of spoiler-ish, so stop reading now if you want. Then again, if you’ve even half a clue what went on in Twilight, you’ll have no surprises in Promise.

The protagonist is a young girl who believes she’s ugly as sin but who keeps getting told by everyone else that she’s gorgeous. The self-loathing yet beautiful young girl moves to a new town and once there she meets a new guy who she is, of course, immediately attracted to.  This guy is mysterious, slightly creepy, and (again, of course) drop dead gorgeous.  Oh, and everyone else thinks he’s bad news.

Guy’s name is Tristan, which I admit is quite a bit nicer (in my opinion) than Edward.  Tristan is constantly wanting to kill Alexis even though he loves her.  He saves her from a potentially/probably fatal car accident, at which point she figures out he’s not really all that “normal”.  No, people, I’m not just superimposing the Twilight plot over this book in some sort of confused daze…this really happens.

Now I could have forgiven this.  Really, I could have, because Kristie Cook’s writing is at least a bit better than Mrs. Meyer’s.  But she lost me with the craptastic “intimate” stuff.

Alexis practically throws herself at Tristan.  In fact, she literally does.  She begs him repeatedly to have sex with her, but of course he refuses.  At one point she feels like she’s losing him so her MOTHER drives her to his house, tells her to do what she has to do, and Alexis proceeds to strip naked and prostrate herself in front of him.  Seriously, in an attempt to keep the guy she offers to give him her virginity if he’ll only please, please, please, ohmigosh, not leave her.  Argh!

I’m going to just stop here, because I literally can’t find anything nice to say about the book except Ms. Cook’s writing style trumps Mrs. Meyer’s by far.  Oh, and the concept was nice – the angel/demon lore was actually interesting and I’m truly sad that absolutely nothing awesome came from such promise.  I suppose I don’t have to say that I’ll be skipping the sequel/s in this series.

Rating: 2 of 5 (<– changing my rating system from 1-10 to 1-5)

Bella Factor: Yes.  Really, I think Alexis was Bella in another life.

Why I Don’t Like Twilight.

Hello, darlings. =)

Since introducing my Bellaesque rating system, I’ve begun receiving quite a few e-Mails informing me just how horrible and delusional and just plain weird I am for hoping against hope that the female protagonists that I’m reading about are as opposite of Bella Swan as they can possibly be.

A few of the messages actually ask me -why- and the people seemed genuinely interested.  So, I will tell all of you why I rate the female protags on a scale of Bellaesque or Non-Bellaesque.

First of all, the books are absolute trash when it comes to the writing itself.  Grammatical errors abound.  The pacing is atrocious. The character development is decidedly lacking.  Where was the editor? Was there an editor? But, hey, I could forgive all that if the -story- was good.  But…well, it wasn’t.

Bella Swan has no personality.  She is an underdeveloped character who is so basic, plain, boring, and empty that I’m surprised she was even able to exist in the imagination of the author.  Her thought processes consist of – “Does Edward like me?  Why does Edward not like me? Am I too ugly for the gorgeousness that is Edward? Do I stink? I really wish Edward liked me.”  Oh, I can’t forget the first day of school thoughts of oh great, my truck won’t stand out!  oh super, my skin won’t stand out! (What?)  One of my fave parts is when Jessica is introducing Bella to her friends and Bella forgets all their names as soon as they’ve been said.  For that matter, she doesn’t remember Jessica’s name til two pages later.  But good old Eddie? Soon as Jessica tells Bella what the beautiful boy’s name is, Bella remembers.  Superficial much?

She’s already read all the assigned English materials, she’s already covered all the biology material.  She’s bored in class and has nothing better to do than worry about why Eddie doesn’t like her strawberry scented hair.  Hmm.  Yes, Mrs. Meyer, we’re seeing that you want us to think of Bella as fairly perfect.  Before the end of Chapter 1 we have Eric, Mike, and Eddie all frothing at the mouth over her.  Wooow!

I could go on.  I could rant about how she becomes the house-slave to her father (cooking and cleaning for him non-stop, it seems) as soon as she arrives in town.  I could moan and groan about the incessant whining that Bella does about her “self imposed purgatory” in Forks.  I could ponder on how it seems Stephenie Meyers likes to stick her female characters into traditional housewife style roles.  But I won’t.  I’ll just…go on.

Once we’ve gotten beyond the “Eddie doesn’t liiiiike me” whining, and we’ve moved into the “romance” portion of things, the real creep factor sets in.  Edward watches her sleep.  He follows her when she goes on outings with her friends.  He’s creeptastic.  He is the ultimate stalker.

Then the breakup.  Bella spends three or four months in a mostly catatonic state (seriously?) and then basically tries to find ways to commit suicide without actually committing suicide.  She acts like a pathetic little girl whose existence literally means nothing to her if she’s not snuggled up against Edward.

Did I mention the part where Edward (and all of the “vampires” in Stephenie Meyer’s little world) SPARKLES?  Like…glittery? Diamonds? Whatever…dazzles…in the sunlight?  That’s right, folks, no melting in the sunlight – we go all Sanrio and start sparkling!  Because that’s what teenage girls like to see, is sparkles! Right? I’m surprised that she didn’t make them pink.

While I can appreciate a new spin on old lore, really, that’s just silly.  She couldn’t figure out how to get around the walking in daylight bit, so she just made them glitter-coated? That’s just a trifle lazy, I think.

Annnnyway.  Another of my favorite bits of this cheeesefest of doom was the romance between Bella and Eddie.  Bella wants to make sweet, sweet love to Edward.  Edward won’t unless they’re married.  Bella doesn’t want to get married because she’s too young.  But Bella also wants Eddie to turn her into a vampire so she doesn’t get old and wrinkly while he just stays young and gorgeous.  Are you confused? Yeah, me too.  UGH.

This series is crap.   Yes, kids will read it.  Yes, it’s sold millions upon millions of copies.  Yes, Stephenie Meyer, her agent, publicists, publishers, editors, whatever – are probably rolling in the dough.  Good for them, super, yay!

But the books are trash.

They teach young, impressionable girls that relying on a man for your very existence is normal and good and even encouraged.  It shows these same impressionable young girls that going to college? Exploring the world? Getting to know yourself? What do those things matter when you have a hunky boyfriend!  Lets all get married at 19 and have a baby and live like happy little housewives in happy little towns because it’s just so PERFECT!

Yeah, no.

Will I let my children read these books? Sure.  I’m not one to prevent anyone from reading what they want to read – but geez, I hope by then that I’ve taught them to have a little more respect for themselves than Bella has for herself.

So, there you go people.  I call a protagonist Bellaesque if she’s an utter flake with no personality and a reliance on others that borders on obsessive.  I call a protagonist Non-Bellaesque when she’s got a brain in her head and knows how to use it.

Feel free to leave comments, they’re only moderated if WordPress thinks you’re a spammer and I check them daily.  But if you want to call me out and tell me I’m wrong when I say Bella has no independent nature at all – please do cite an example.  I’d love to see!